Who won, who lost in the Iran-Israel war tension

Of course, it would be foolish to assume that the matter is settled here. Deep political and ideological antagonism separates these two enemies—Iran and Israel.

There are internal divisions within the governments of the two countries, creating a climate of extreme uncertainty and incitement. We saw a terrible example of that in the last few days. The Pandora’s box of face-to-face warfare was instantly opened.

The shadow war that the two countries were fighting for years, they brought the war to the light of day in front of everyone’s eyes. Iran has shown that it is capable of attacking Israel anywhere, anytime, directly or indirectly. And Israel has shown that it is capable of attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities if it wants to, the next attack will be even more devastating.

This deadlock between Israel and Iran is inextricably linked with the Palestinian conflict. But Palestine is not playing any role in resolving the crisis. And in the Palestinian crisis, the position of the West became stronger than before.

UK Foreign Secretary David Cameron has become a symbol of a one-sided, two-pronged policy. He has been desperately trying to get humanitarian aid to Gaza, but has been equally lax in trying to get a ceasefire. As a result, his policy met with little success.

One reason for this may be that Rishi Sunak’s government does not want to miss the opportunity to sell weapons to Israel. Another reason is Cameron’s refusal to condemn the April 1 Israeli airstrike on the Iranian consulate in Damascus (which killed several senior Iranian commanders, and Iran retaliated against Israel).